Comments on: MOTU Microbook II parametric filters https://johnr.hifizine.com/2012/11/motu-microbook-ii-parametric-filters/ Technologicality, at work and play Mon, 02 Mar 2020 23:33:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25 By: John Reekie https://johnr.hifizine.com/2012/11/motu-microbook-ii-parametric-filters/#comment-3634 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:26:58 +0000 http://johnr.hifizine.com/?p=224#comment-3634 Hi “…” 🙂

Interesting point. I looked around a little and there do seem to be varying definitions of “bandwidth” (=1/Q) for a peaking/notch filter. One way to experiment with this (without actually having the units) is the EQ window in Room EQ Wizard. While the -3 dB point makes sense for bandpass filters and maybe a graphic EQ (*), parametrics (digital ones anyway) seem to often use the dB half-scale value i.e. -5 dB for a 10 dB peak, -1 dB for a 2 dB peak, etc. By that definition Type II in the MicroBook does seem to be “constant Q.”

(*) I never understood how this definition can be correct even for a graphic, as the Q is undefined if boost is < 3 dB... Thank you for your interesting comment.

]]>
By: ... https://johnr.hifizine.com/2012/11/motu-microbook-ii-parametric-filters/#comment-3555 Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:32:21 +0000 http://johnr.hifizine.com/?p=224#comment-3555 In the manual, they say “The Type II EQ filter produces constant Q response during boost or cut.” This doesn’t seem right. According to everyone else, the constant Q is more like Type I:

http://rane.com/par-c.html#constant_Q
http://www.klarkteknik.com/faq-06.php

]]>